子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   题型   >  
本题由2提供

Arts advocate: Few universities require that students who are specializing in science and technology take many art courses. However, real progress in science and technology requires an element of creativity, which the arts foster. Thus, to help science and technology students succeed in their careers, universities should increase the number of art courses required for

them.

Which of the following would, if true, most strengthen the argument above?

    A. Universities required more art courses for science and technology students in the past.

    B. Participation in art courses increases students’ creative thinking in their science and technology courses.

    C. More students who are interested in art would specialize in science and technology if the number of art courses required for those programs were increased.

    D. Some of the most prominent scientists began their careers as artists.

    E. Discussion of science and technology topics in art courses increases creative thinking among students in those courses.

登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

资深讲师题题有解析

{{current}} / {{duration}}

登录 申友雷哥GMAT,查看完整视频

文字解析

答案:
B
Argument Ev
aluation

Situation 

The arts advocate argues that universities should increase the number of art courses required for students specializing in science and technology, with the

goal of helping these students succeed in their careers. Few universities require students in these fields to take many art courses.


Reasoning 

What piece of information, if true and added to the argument, would most strengthen it? One of the arts advocate’s premises is that progress in science and technology requires creativity. Another premise is that courses in the arts foster creativity. The conclusion is that universities should, for the sake of promoting career success, require students specializing in science and

technology to take more courses in art. Suppose that participation in art

courses enriches students’ participation in the science and technology courses: that would be a further reason for universities to require that the students take more art courses.

A. This does not indicate that increasing art offerings now for science and technology

students is the most prudent course of action. Universities’ past decision to offer fewer art courses for science and technology students may have resulted from review of data, careful analysis, and prudent policy assumptions. For example, the decision may have been required in order to finance provision of more science and technology courses.

B. Correct. This suggests that participation in art courses increases the value of science and technology courses, an additional piece of information that strengthens the argument.

C. The argument does not suggest that the goal of requiring science and technology students to take more art courses is to persuade more students interested in art to

specialize in science and technology. This information is therefore largely irrelevant to the arts advocate’s Reasoning.

D. This information does not address the role art may have played in the scientists’ achievements in science and technology. Several of these scientists may well have been aspiring artists who failed or became disenchanted and discovered that they could

better exploit their talents in science and technology.

E. The arts advocate does not advocate that science and technology topics be addressed in art courses. The arts advocate’s Reasoning focuses on the value of art courses in fostering creativity.

 

The correct answer is B.


GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282